Random Historical Anecdotes

In yesterday’s world human beings counted on the likes of true unbiased journalists for information, the likes of Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather…

In today’s world human beings count on the likes of extremely biased COMEDIANS for information gathering, the likes of John Oliver and Jon Stewart.

And this is just another reason why the world is burning.

In 1974 the Republican president of the United States of America, Richard Nixon, with a beautiful record that could have put him very high in the rankings of greatest presidents of all time, announced his resignation over the Watergate scandal. He resigned after 2 years of intense political and judicial turmoil.

Now, I as a conservative fully capable of accepting the fact that yes, Nixon did a very bad thing, and that yes, Nixon did the right thing by resigning and if he had not done so then he should have and rightfully WOULD have been impeached.

So, I ask you, he/she who voted for Hillary Clinton (Or Bernie and now plans to vote for Hillary since he’s out)… Knowing what we know about Benghazi and “Emailgate” which are both very very very much conjoined and extremely layered with multiple different offenses on both issues that would lead to very important political and judicial ramifications for any president of our country… How are you not, as a liberal, fully capable of accepting the fact that yes, Clinton did very bad things, and that yes, Clinton would have to resign and if she didn’t then she should and rightfully would be impeached?

I guess I’m giving them too much credit, pretending that they are as open minded as I am about these problems.


Ronald Reagan’s (failed) presidential campaign in 1976 inspired so many people of the Republican voter-base that it ruined Gerald Ford’s (Republican party nominee) chances and handed the victory to Jimmy Carter (D).

Are we going to see the same thing happen with Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton? Thus a landslide Donald Trump victory?

Many Bernie supporters will vote for Trump of Hillary, because he actually stands for many of the same things that Bernie does. Antiwar, public-funded, higher taxes on the ultra-rich, etc.

Obama = Jimmy Carter
An ineffective leader who only got in because of the failures of the previous leader. Unfortunately for us, Jimmy Carter ended up showing his true colors of complete incompetency in his first term, Obama didn’t impose his far left bullshit until his second term. His first term was spent laying low, biding his time until he could ruin us with his forced totalitarian schemes.

Trump = Ronald Reagan
Coming in after an ineffective leader with the simple idea that America should be great, that the lives of American citizens should be great, and that open-minded conservationism is the answer to the problems we face.

Let us all take a moment to appreciate the fact that the human race was never subtracted from the planet in the Cold War.


The Death of a Celebrity

The death of a celebrity sparks every other celebrity to “honor them” in some way, but in reality we’re living in a time where it’s all just a pool of sharks dying for those few seconds of viral notoriety to get their names trending for a day.

Prince dies and everyone immediately runs to the nearest stage to perform a Prince cover, not because they just love Prince’s music so much, because they didn’t cover his songs before, but because they know if they are the first to cover a Prince song after Prince dies in this “touching tribute” then they were have their names in the Facebook and Twitter trending bar for a few hours, get a few million views off of it, and count that cash all the way through. Kevin Smith uploaded a clip of him talking shit about Prince from the late 90’s right after Prince died, just because he knew it would get decent traffic. When Justice Antonin Scalia died Coheed and Cambria immediately reposted that stupid parody song that they wrote about him, which really was just a plea for fascism disguised in a bad attempt at comedy. These people are happy that someone died because they’re able to make a few dollars off of it.

Which at the end of the day is a flaw in the internet’s current system. From YouTube, to Twitter and Facebook, etc, Everything is based off of when something shows up, when something is posted. My videos on my Jonjey Comms YouTube channel can get thousands of views in the first day and 5 in the following week. Not to make it about me, because at the end of the day I’m inconsequential in the sea of the internet, but there is a legitimate sense of pressure to put out a video on breaking topics the second they happen, to the point where it’s not actually about quality, just quantity and time. Push out enough nonsense, the second something happens, and eventually you’ll have a bunch of views.

But maybe it’s just human nature. Maybe the internet and the way it is formed is the manifestation of human nature. The most successful companies in the world are garbage companies with garbage products; McDonald’s, Domino’s, Subway, so forth and so on, while food companies with actual integrity rarely get beyond a local level… Music, vanilla pop songs that are literally about nothing are a million times more successful than actual sonic art these days. Musicians that I look up to, musicians that I, after 10+ years of playing guitar on a daily basis can look up to and find genuine inspiration from are stuck touring the country in vans and playing to SOLD OUT SHOWS of 700 people while Drake plays to sold out shows of 25,000+. And thus, on YouTube you’ll find the most successful people are appealing to the lowest common denominator, pushing out mindless, vapid, vanilla content day after day with absolutely no artistic integrity or even inspiration or effort being put into any particular piece of content.

So really, if there’s anything you can learn from this it’s that human beings suck, philanthropy is really just advertisement in disguise, Bruce Springsteen only cancelled the concert in NC to secure a headline, not to protest HB2, and generally speaking quality art is very rarely appreciated as widely as it deserves to be. Hell, if it were then I’d be getting paid a lot of money to write this shit.

The Internet.

Now, I don’t want to tell you what to believe in. After all, I’m not a religious man. But I do suggest you be able to understand the hypocrisy in voting for Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton while pretending to be “for the people”. It’s not propaganda, the videos I make and the words I share on here are not meant to manipulate you or to push any thing on to any one. I simply want to inspire others to use free thought in forming their opinions. I understand that can be very, very hard when you have society seemingly breathing down your neck to be more “like them”, more liberal… But in reality, the entire liberal ideology is much smaller than you think it is.
We’re in a time where the internet is the biggest thing in the world, but more young people are on the internet than older people, and thus more young people aren’t versed enough to understand politics and fall to the left by default. So, we’re living in a time where many people’s lives play out on the internet; On your smart phone constantly, youtube when you’re at home or away, twitter always, facebook a must. Most people get their news from the internet as well.
What happens here? Well, when an insanely vocal minority of the population becomes the majority on a place where many people spend almost 100% of their time, it seems like liberalism has just completely taken over, it’s everywhere, everyone’s a liberal. This simply is not the case, the internet is an echo chamber hive mind for liberalism and, as much as liberals hate when this is said; Communism. Fascism. The eradication of free speech, the eradication of honesty.
I know a lot of my friends on here disregard a lot of what I post because they think it’s too mean, or somehow an uneducated opinion despite no evidence to show it, but at the end of the day if you can’t break yourself away from the hive mind, a hive mind whom’s sole purpose for existence is the indoctrination of college-aged youth, then I don’t know what to do. Obviously it’s not my job to do anything for you guys, but enlightenment is very important, free thinking is very important, and understanding actual reality vs the prism of jaded distorted reality that liberalism dictates you view things through, it’s very important. Not for me, but for all of us.
The simple idea that the middle class should be able to hold on to more of their money, the simple idea that money enhances one’s quality of life more than the lack there-of, the simple idea that we should be more worried about you, I, we, the people, than the government that holds their power over our heads while incompetently using OUR money for THEIR needs…
I genuinely don’t see how anyone can disagree with it… I don’t understand where someone can disagree with the logic of enhancing OUR quality of lives being the #1 priority. And yes, OUR includes all colors, religions, genders, and/or the lack there-of.

Michelle Fields, Double Standards, Being a Man

How are we living in a world where a woman (Michelle Fields) can accuse a man (Corey Lewandowski) of physically assaulting her, with video evidence showing exactly the contrary, and that woman does not end up in jail for it? Not only does she not end up in jail, but she actually is supported by liberals and even the feminist conservative movement of S.E. Cupp, Dana Loesch, Megyn Kelly etc.

These “conservative” women hate Trump, so they support Michelle Fields, even though there is undeniable video evidence showing that she was never hurt. The entire story is bullshit, from the fake bruises to her claims of being “almost thrown to the ground”. Then she’s got her little beta low energy white knight cuckold friend-boy who will regurgitate any lie that she tells him to just so he can be able to get in her pants,

Isn’t it funny how a woman can accuse a man of rape and when it turns out that she wasn’t raped at all, she doesn’t go to jail for it? Meanwhile it could have and probably still did damage that man for the rest of his life.

Double standards? Let’s complain about double standards; A woman who lowers herself to the standards of a man is a pig, just as that same woman calls all men pigs, she herself is a pig. Ignorance is bliss; denial can save your existence because if you dared to be honest with yourself for even one moment then your world would come crashing down around you.

Is it double standards for a man to be a man and to be proud to be a man and the woman should not want to be a man and should not be proud to be what a man is? Is it double standards to hold women to higher standards because they are instinctually and biologically predetermined to be better people in general? To be more wholesome, to be more kind, to have more integrity, to stay loyal. A man’s biological point of existence is to have sex with as many women as possible. A woman’s biological point of existence is to keep one man for as long as possible. So yeah, when you’re a slut you are going against your predetermined point of existence, and when a man is a slut he is just existing within his own point of existence. Double standards? How is it double standards to hold women to higher standards? How is it double standards to think of women as better, to expect women to have more integrity, pride, self-worth? To hold onto something special, rather than laying down in the dirt with the lowest of the low day after day and expecting yourself to be righteous because “that’s what the guys do”. I don’t want to fuck a man, I don’t want to be with a man, I want to be with a beautiful, smart, wholesome woman. Luckily, I AM. My girl is the only honest version of feminism that exists in the world; The simple idea that women should be, and are, equal to men, but that a woman should not be a man, a woman is a woman, proud to be feminine, proud to be submissive to her man, proud to do whatever it takes to make her man happy. Modern feminism is about the degradation of femininity, the idea that women should be like men, that equality for women is about being able to do what a man does and to be as filthy and disgusting as a man is, without judgment for it. Yet, these women who want to be manly pigs hate men…?

We live in a world where simply being male and existing within the parameters of what a male is designed to be makes you an asshole, makes you a pig, makes you disgusting, makes you a chauvinist, makes you a misogynist, makes you an animal. We live in a society where displaying any level of masculinity makes you lesser in the social construct created by Social Justice Warrior nonsense. Simply by living by the predetermined point of existence that a male human being is biologically and instinctually designed to exist within, you’re an awful, horrible person, in today’s standards. Let that sink in, when all these people are talking about how oppressed they are, yet a man giving a girl a compliment makes him a creep, a man having a few different girls around makes him a pig, a boyfriend or husband watching porn somehow makes him a pervert or deviant. You know how many bitches don’t let their man watch porn? It’s fucking disgusting. My girl has let me freely and openly jerk off to porn on a daily basis for years and could not care less, because she’s a real woman who understands what a real man is and what a real man needs to have in his life. There are so many bitches that aren’t real, they don’t understand what it’s like to be a real woman because they were told that a real woman is what a man is, but a girl can never be what a man is. A 40 year old female millionaire isn’t any more attractive than the cute 19 year old white girl who made your subway sandwich on your lunch break today, because women aren’t supposed to be men, men are men, women are women, and the sooner women realize that they don’t need to be men, the sooner our world can get back in order. But you know what’s funny? These feminists, these social justice warrior cunts, these bitches crave masculinity because none of their cuckold faggot boyfriends are men. Girls are by nature submissive creatures, a real woman who knows her role will be what you need them to be right off the top and will treat you the way you deserve to be treated, as their god, as long as you’re a good man for them. These feminist bitches need to be broken first, they live in denial, pretending that you’re everything that they hate, pretending that you’re a bad guy, that their guy is the good guy. In reality, their guy is the backwards beta faggot who lies to them on a daily basis to steal vagina, which is the literal definition of rape really, the theft of pussy. Manipulative backwards low energy soft cucks who coerce the woman into spreading legs for them, which at the end of the day they only obtain through charity. Sounds a lot like the Democratic playbook though, doesn’t it? Manipulate, tell them what they want to hear, pander, coddle, the end game being the theft of votes through coercion.

I’ll be your life coach today, I’ll teach you how to be a man, I’ll teach you how to not be a low energy Yeb type of guy. The way to get a decent woman who knows her role is literally just by being assertive, you can be overweight, you can be funny looking, as long as you’re put together, smell decent, dress well, have a nice haircut, present yourself properly, and have a masculine way about you, you can get any single decent woman out there to spend some time with you. Assertive, is a big thing with women, assert your existence into their mind, assert the existence of you as a man, a man that can do things for them, a man that can give them they want. Assert your dominance, eye contact, smile, flirt, even just get touchy, it fucking works. But don’t get touchy in a creepy way, I don’t know, maybe I’m lucky, maybe I don’t understand the plight of the forever alone type because I’ve always found it very easy to get girls to dig me, but honestly you can just put your arm around a girl at the right time and it works, they are submissive by nature, women want to submit and they want to have a man assert themselves onto them. I know some of this sounds like cave man shit, and some of it might sound creepy if you’re picturing a creepy dude doing it, but honestly women will like you for asserting yourself onto them more than if you pussy-foot around and act all shy and weird. A great way to get most girls these days is to first put it into their head that you don’t want to be with them, then put it into their head that they want to be with you, and then put into their head the idea that you would maybe consider being with them. I know that sounds manipulative, but girls are weird man. You can’t seem desperate, you need to make sure that they don’t forget where they are to you, that they’re just another chick who you could maybe think about giving something to, don’t ever let it seem like you’re trying to get them. For instance; You’re at work, you’re going to lunch or whatever, when you walk passed the girl you dig, “Hey, I’m heading out, try not to miss me too much.” I know, it sounds reallllll corny, but that puts the idea that THEY want YOU into their mind without putting the idea that YOU want THEM into their mind. Usually they’ll laugh, say something sarcastic like “Yeah that’ll be so hard” and you can reply with some even cornier shit like “I totally understand, it happens, just try to contain yourself when I get back.”. This puts the idea that you aren’t that interested in them into their mind, all while pretty much blatantly flirting and making her laugh. This asserts you as the one controlling things, you’re the one in charge, the next time you go out to lunch you can invite them or something, but don’t just say “EXCUSE ME MA’AM WILL YOU PLEASE HONOR MY LIFE BY LETTING ME LOOK AT YOU EAT A TURKEY SANDWICH”, say some shit like “Hey I’m heading out to lunch and I’ll let you come with me if you want.”

Do you see the pattern here? Be assertive, but don’t be desperate and weird. Flirt, but don’t be too complimentary. Don’t let them feel above you, don’t let it seem like you’re desperate for their attention or company. You’re the fucking man, you’re the guy that could make her life better, you’re the guy who could get her whatever the fuck she wants in life. You’re a lottery ticket, that’s what men are to women, lottery tickets, and if you’re a fucking low energy cuck then you’re just another ticket she’ll scratch off and throw to the side, most of the time without even taking the time to let you get anywhere. Women want to get that winning lottery ticket and hold onto it forever. But here’s where a lot of guys go wrong; They get the beautiful girl, they settle down, and they forget how they got the beautiful girl, they stop trying. You need to know how to get a girl to keep your girl on top of her game.

I’m a man raised by a man and ready to be a man, I wasn’t raised by a woman so I mean I’m a bit harsh I guess but I know what it means to be a man and my lovely woman is very grateful for that every day. Being a man isn’t about being able to change a tire, which you should also be able to do, but it’s not about drinking uncut whiskey and shit like that, being a man is a state of existence, it’s your character, it’s what you are and who you are, and if you’re not dominating bitches on a regular basis then you aren’t being a man, you’re being a low energy type. Never be a low energy type.

NC HB2 Bill / NC Transgender Bathroom Bill

Hey everyone, I’d like to talk about the transgender issue in North Carolina. I live in North Carolina, so as a North Carolinian I’m very close to this HB2, aka “the bathroom bill”, that dictates that the city of Charlotte has no right to oppress women with the legal allowance of a man entering their locker room and stating that he is a woman. I hear people talking about it in public, as I live in a very disgustingly liberal town, and I hear it on the conservative talk radio that I listen to regularly. Honestly, this discussion is everywhere, it’s far more broad than the borders of North Carolina.

San Francisco mayor Ed Lee didn’t really give a shit when an innocent civilian in his town was gunned down by a violent illegal immigrant, because that would be intolerant and judgmental, yet he cares so much about NC’s fantastic governor Pat McCrory stopping the ultra-lib town of Charlotte from allowing men to enter female bathrooms and locker rooms legally that Ed Lee decided to ban all publicly funded city employee’s travel to NC. Bruce Springsteen cancelled a concert here in North Carolina to protest the bill, because even though he has this image of being “for the working man, for the common man”, he really is just another mindless liberal who pushes out anti-American songs and hates you and your opinions. Bryan Adams cancelled a show here too, not like anyone was going to go in the first place, but he DID do a show in Egypt where you can get a few years in prison simply for being gay. It’s funny, isn’t it? How these musicians can be so blatant with their hand, so obvious in their attempts to secure a headline, to make their name relevant again. So desperate to be a part of the hive mind and to get the hive mind behind them, all for monetary gain. The same could be said for the company Paypal, who has come out against North Carolina and Pat McCrory over all of this, despite the fact that they have their customer service centers in Singapore, where you can be jailed for a minimum of 2 years for being homosexual. Amazing, when you put that into perspective isn’t it? Not allowing a pervert to use the women’s locker room is oppressive here in America, but putting someone in jail because of what they are attracted to is par for the course in plenty of places across the world.

This is the world we are living in. There are human beings in this world that really do have this absolutely corrupt and distorted view of reality.

Meanwhile we have liberals in NC that hate Pat McCrory, because even though under his leadership we’ve jumped 5-10 ranks in basically everything that matters (Employment, wages, less welfare, etc) it’s the big things like letting dudes into women’s locker rooms that are truly important issues in our time, right?

Because liberals just can’t decide whether they want to be misogynists or transphobic, because any decision seemingly oppresses someone. They choose misogyny, though, because they simply do not care whether or not many women get traumatized for life by sexual assault, rape, etc from a strange man in a dress going into a woman’s bath room if it means that a well-meaning transgender person gets to pee sitting down in the girl’s room.

Because it’s not about liberating people, it’s not about helping people out, it’s not about looking out for anyone, as I’ve said before, it is simply about opposing the conservative point of view at all times. It’s fine if a woman gets raped because of this law, that doesn’t matter and who cares, because conservatives are against that woman being raped, and therefore they’re the intolerant, evil, transphobic people for being such feminists that they’d refuse the rights of someone who is mentally ill with Body Dysmorphic Disorder to ensure that the women of North Carolina don’t have to become victims of heinous, perverted acts.

Liberals are very quick to say that this bill should be passed because plenty of transgender people use the bathroom of the opposite sex already without any of us knowing… But don’t you realize that that’s the entire point of all of this? The point is that we’ve been doing just fine for years, because only passable, real, legitimate transgenders have been able to do it. Because no one knows the difference, and at that point, no one cares. Saying that this law would be a good thing would be to slap that all in the face, because the law only exists to keep creeps and perverts out of bathrooms and locker rooms of the opposite sex.

And yes, women have been raped by men hiding in women’s bathrooms/locker rooms before. Plenty of times. If even ONE woman gets raped because of a creep in a dress being legally allowed to hang out in that bathroom, was it worth it? Was it worth it when it could have been avoided while real transgenders still could have used the bathroom they feel comfortable in in the first place, as proven by your own comment?

Liberals literally can not disagree with this because it’s entirely based on the liberal opinion itself.

The moderate case for Donald Trump.

So I stumbled across this picture on Facebook today, shared by a liberal person on my friends list, and it got me thinking some things. Now, I know many liberals consider Ronald Reagan to be basically the only good Republican president in modern history, and I just had a thought I’d like to share if you agree with that notion… Basically, I believe that many liberals hate Republicans and the conservative point of view over failures in the presidential administrations of multiple Republican presidents and presidential campaigns of major Republican candidates in modern times, they see Ford, Nixon, Bush 1, and Bush 2, McCain, and Romney as jokes, failures, incompetent morons, so forth and so on, but they tend to believe that Reagan was at the very least an acceptable president, if not a solid one, sort of how many conservatives view Bill Clinton.

This brings me around to the actual point of this, which is that if we agree with the above paragraph then we have to acknowledge the fact that the only president/presidential candidate that I mentioned before who actually stood for realistic and honest conservative views was Ronald Reagan. Many conservatives could find more things to hate than to praise about the administrations of Ford, Nixon, Bush 1 & 2, and even the campaigns of McCain, Romney, etc… Much like many liberals feel the same way about Barack Obama, more to hate than to praise. This would obviously explain why Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders have done so well in 2016…

SO, with all of that said, would you say that maybe, just maybe, a break from the religious neocon ESTABLISHMENT GOP that are ruled by corporations and don’t have even the tiniest interest in we, the people, could be a good thing? As in, maybe a moderate nationalist non-establishment Republican president would be the best current option we have after 16 years of blatantly corrupt establishment politicians and particularly 8 years of the obliteration of our economy, massive welfare spending, and massive tax hikes?

I get that liberals want to go with Bernie, I understand that they believe in Socialism and that they, for whatever reason, believe that bigger government will somehow be a good thing. However, if we were living in 2008 and we had just wrapped up 8 years of neocon bullshit, then I’d say it would be safe to give it a shot. But guess what? That already happened. We went through 8 years of neocon bullshit, and we gave this a shot. Whatever you want to call it, because I know that liberals get upset when I or anyone else call Obama a Socialist, whatever you want to call the massive tax hikes and the massive welfare tides, the horrible things it has done to US, the citizens of this country, can not be denied, and that is not up for debate. You don’t believe in trickle down? Well, can’t you see the way the implementation of the extreme welfare state has trickled into every aspect of our economy and way of life? Trickle down works, and it works both ways. If you have massive tax hikes and give out free money to the lowest of the low, then everyone is worse off because of it. That’s trickle down. If you have massive tax cuts and provide incentives to work hard for better pay, then everyone is better off because of it. That’s trickle down.

Only in today’s current culture can easily led people be manipulated into believing that when a man says he wants to keep your job safer, what he really means is that he hates Mexicans and all legal immigrants. Or that when that same man says he wants to keep YOU safer, what he really means is that he hates Muslims. Or that when he says the breaking of laws should be met with punishment for said crimes, what he really means is that he hates women.

What does a Donald Trump presidency mean for you, the citizen? Well, if you’re a straight white male American then it means that you’re going to be safer due to less illegal immigration as well as less importation of potential terrorist threats. It means your job will be more secure due to less illegal immigration, lower taxes, less infringement on businesses, both big and small. It means that you’ll have more job opportunities due to less infringement on businesses that will allow for more growth and higher revenues. You’ll earn higher wages through the proper free market rather than artificial wage increases through a minimum wage increase. You will get to keep more of your hard-earned money, you’ll get to have better quality healthcare, you’ll get to see the economy flourish through less taxes, and less welfare.

But what if you’re a… Poor, gay, black transsexual American? Well, I have some good news… Literally everything I just said also applies to you. You see, because Donald Trump doesn’t hate you for being poor, gay, black, or for suffering from body dysmorphic disorder… He wants to see you, the poor, gay, black transsexual American, live a better life. Because that’s the essence of the Donald Trump campaign, unfiltered, unwavering, moderate conservative nationalism.

But wait, he hates people from other countries, right? Well, no, he just wants to put you, the American citizen, above them solely in the priorities of the government that is supposed to serve you, that is supposed to ensure YOUR quality of life, not the quality of life of a disenfranchised citizen of Uzbekistan!

So, with all of this said I’ll wrap this all up with a bow; If you disliked Bush 1, 2 or 3, if you loath Obama, if you hate Hillary, if you had disdain for Romney… If you can even find it within yourself to admit that yes, Ronald Reagan was a great president… Then isn’t it time you admit to yourself that you should be voting for Donald Trump in 2016?